disclaimer: this is merely what the title suggests. comments for this are disabled so as to avoid the "oh but you're so good" feedback. it's a subject every performer must come to terms with. I hope those of you who are artists find it helpful in some small way.
My students are often perplexed or pleasantly surprised to find out I study opera as well as teach English. I think many are surprised, most of all, to discover that it's what I'd rather be doing. Of course it's a very glamorous idea, but they are wise to the fact that there are many obstacles on this particular road.
I just quit my job, but if one of my students had asked me what the most difficult thing about my other career is, I'd get them to take out their vocabulary lists and add:
re‧jec‧tion1 [uncountable and countable] the act of not accepting, believing in, or agreeing with something [≠ acceptance]
rejection of
What are the reasons for his rejection of the theory?
2 [uncountable and countable] the act of not accepting someone for a job, school etc [≠ acceptance]:
They sent me a rejection letter.
3 [uncountable] a situation in which someone stops giving you love or attention:
He was left with a feeling of rejection and loss.
Definition from the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
Advanced Learner's Dictionary.It's important, when you're learning new vocabulary, to understand its full range of usages, as well as the expressions and contexts usually associated with it. An artist's situation most readily falls into entry number two in the above definition, but humour me, my hypothetical English class, while I try and find a bright side to this very difficult noun.
1. In this case, rejection is synonymous with disagreement, or with the absence of belief in something. Rejection of an ideology, a religion, a political bent, a theory or hypothesis; or, rejection of one's interpretation of the role, perhaps. Sometimes it's a question of taste, isn't it, especially when we're dealing with conductors and directors who have specific visions for a production or ideas about performance practice of early music.
Would I be willing to compromise my artistic concept in an audition? No, I don't think so -- what if I guessed wrong as to what they might be thinking of, anyway? Then I wouldn't be any farther ahead, and I wouldn't have shown my particular brand of artistry, which might have been what they were looking for in the first place. To thine own self be true, even if you're scared it isn't to someone else's liking.
2. This is more straightforward, isn't it? The letter in your hand either says yes or no. When you audition for Guildhall, you finish singing and wait in the hall for 2-3 minutes before that very letter is in your hand: you've barely had time to form an objective opinion about your singing, and you're still in a very vulnerable place, so when the letter says no, it comes as a really big slap in the face.
There is no easy answer to this. The only consolation is that often, it has nothing to do with how you performed. After a while, and a stack of rejection letters, you start to wonder who IS looking for your particular voice and look and whether you'll be there when the chance comes up?
I have thought about collecting my rejection letters in a folder, so that when I start to get acceptances, I might look back at how far I've come and what rollercoasters I had to ride to get there, and feel thankful. But many of us fear: what if the acceptances never come! And then I'd be stuck with a pile of salt to rub into my wounds.
3. This could be applied to the relationship the singer has with her voice: let me tell you, it exists. The voice takes on a life of its own; sometimes it is nothing but obedient and sweet, even generous and unexpected; sometimes, it has its own ideas about how it's going to go; and sometimes, it deserts you entirely in your hour of need. It's tempting to have something to blame other than yourself. Indeed, there are many who would advise to think of your voice as separate from yourself, so that criticism and rejection do not appear to you are personal attacks, but commentary on an instrument.
The relationship goes two ways. Your voice can appear to reject you when you sing a terrible audition for which you should have theoretically sung the shit out of, pardon my French; the high notes just don't work like they should, or your runs are sloppy. What gives?
In the long term, after years of diligent practice and near-obsession and a whole string of no's, Voice begins to resemble an absent spouse: there in your life, but present in name only, remiss in giving the support you need in your endeavours, and failing to provide what things it promised implicitly to provide by entering this relationship with you: after all, why, when you have poured your blood, sweat, and tears into the relationship and given Voice everything you have, are you left with nothing? The relationship shouldn't be one-sided! Hard work should pay off; you've done your part, so it can't be your fault. The blame must fall somewhere.
At a certain point, and that point is different for everyone, either Voice starts pulling its weight, or you reject it: you get a divorce. You leave; you quit.
Perhaps that is what I find hardest about this line of work: in many careers, hard work and complete devotion results in raises, promotions, and recognition. To boot, you feel as though something very personal is on the line.
The fear to overcome is not fear of rejection, I think; your artistry should not be affected so easily by outside forces. The fear of giving your all to your relationship with your voice is much more pertinent. If you hold anything back from that relationship you can never be sure that Voice will deliver 100% either. A great deal of faith, trust and love of yourself, your voice, and your art is required.
This is what I am learning.